For journalists and wise people
A story for a story!
Why was the design of the health transformation plan wrong?
Dr. Omid Rezai
Nutrition transformation plan!
By allocating a budget, we decide to give chalukbob dinner and lunch to all the people because they deserve the best.
is it bad Well, it’s not bad! What can be better and more humane than this, especially when some people do not have even one meal to get enough.
They ask: Why has this not been done in any rich country in the world? We answer: Because they do not care about human dignity and they do not have our initiative either.
In order to achieve this goal, we design this path:
1- We say to all the cooks in the city that you have no right to work in private restaurants and you are obliged to work for us, we will give you the salary and benefits.
Amendment 1: We attack chefs in the media and call them money lovers in the private sector.
2- We allow all people (whether hungry or full) to visit the restaurant at any time of the day and night and eat as much chalukbob as they want. A wave of happiness is sweeping the country.
Amendment two: Restaurants should only prepare food from the place we determine and we create a monopoly.
3- Long queues are created in front of our restaurants and the real hungry people are placed in long queues.
It seems that we don’t have that many restaurants and seats for so many customers.
Amendment three: We tell the cooks and other employees to work three times. We will pay their money one day.
4- Some people protest that we are tired of waiting in line for food and we want to go to different restaurants with our own money. In many cities, there are no private restaurants and in other places they are facing bankruptcy.
Amendment 4: We think that by building hundreds of government mega restaurants, we can eradicate the private sector altogether, so that people’s dissatisfaction
also end
5- We are happy that our plan has been welcomed and people are eating chalukbab day and night, we made a little mistake in our calculations, it seems that each person ate seven or eight presses in one day, which is strange! We are afraid that our budget will not be enough. We design a kind of staircase, the more each cook works, the less money he gets.
Amendment five: We have created a rift and a fight between the cooks and the assistant cooks and the hostesses of the restaurants.
6- The news comes that the quality of the food has decreased, the cooks are unhappy, we think of tripling the capacity of the cooking test and if necessary, we can quickly make a chef with the help of the cooks.
Cashiers also announce readiness for cooking.
Amendment 6: Quality is not important, quantity is important. We must succeed. Even if we give burnt food to people.
7- Our accounts and financial books were wrong, we did not pay the rice and meat importers. In the media, we attack the cooks and their seniors, and we remember the feeding of a large number of hungry people.
Seventh Amendment: We know we have made a mistake, but we are not making a mistake.
This is a familiar path that was taken in the health reform plan.
In the end, the hungry were also fed, but we could feed them with a budget that was several times what we could have normally.
In this way, by closing hundreds of restaurants, we made a large number of people unemployed, wasted thousands of tons of rice and meat because it was free for people, destroyed thousands of interested cooks and forced cashiers to cook, and most importantly We have done something so that no one can get rid of the strange habit of eating 10 chalukbabs a day from the people of this city.
Our heart aches for the next nutritionist, with these strange habits remaining for people and this
A huge amount of debt and financial debt.
Dr. Omid Rezai
Specialist in oncology and hematology
https://t.me/omidrezaie55
This post is written by studentforeverIR