If they have said or ordered that you have to collect the surface of the formal maps, it is not too difficult to collect it:
What is important is what happens in practice, not the definitions that are written in theory and on paper
It is important that due to some reasons (whatever they may be, good or bad, right or wrong, right or wrong) the decision of the majority of the owners to build a building is more and different from the urban planning standards of the municipality.
Engineers (apart from some of the services of respected architect colleagues) are responsible for the design, supervision and implementation of technical and engineering services in their field, not the urban planning standards of the municipality.
If the rules and regulations of the municipality allow it (which does not seem to be the case), at the very beginning of the work, phase one architectural plans attached to the permit will be prepared and presented based on the final plan and size that the respected owner wants to build, and phase two plans for others The fields should be prepared there based on it.
If the maps attached to the permit must necessarily be in accordance with the municipal urban development regulations (without the wrong size), probably the only remaining solution is that the owner is obliged after the issuance of the permit before starting what he is going to do in order to prepare the executive maps of the phase. An architecture by the respected designer and then the implementation plans of the second phase of other fields should be implemented and all the documentation of this process should be registered in the organization’s system. You know that it is not difficult at all to define methods to oblige the owner to what was said
The executive plans in the above process are registered, official and can be cited, and the design engineer will be responsible and accountable until the end, because what he designed and delivered will be implemented in practice, so all the technical standards and requirements of the national building regulations It will apply
During the execution of the work, there may be a need for changes in the design, which can be applied in the form of revisions in the design drawings after obtaining the opinion and approval of the designer, and maybe in more detailed cases based on the opinion of the esteemed executive engineers and Be the supervisor of the action. In the end, a billet map is prepared from what has been made in the end.
Ezbilt means what was made and not what was designed!!! Because it is possible that there will be some degree of minor difference between what was designed and what was implemented.
In any case, even if there is not the slightest discrepancy between the latest version of the design and the implementation, it is not the duty of the design engineer to prepare and sign the billet.
Please respect the basic definitions of the description of engineering services (at least so that others do not find and laugh at us)
Give value to the issue of design services in this way to see which design engineer will be willing to show his capacity (with the argument that it is always in his mind but he does not say it and that what I am signing is a form, a few worthless sheets of paper and # (In practice, it is not implemented, so it is not responsible) to sell for free.
First provide the platform, then condemn the engineer to free sales and fake services
This post is written by ashabibi1355