But which virus, this is an interesting discussion!
The article that I put in the group is a summary of numerous scientific articles, farm observations and breeders’ reports from the region of Khorasan, Semnan, Isfahan and Yazd.
Maybe friends do not have hands on research and scientific work and scientific experiments due to busy work, or lack of personal desire or any other reason, but we, who are familiar with the process of proving a scientific claim, must provide clear information to the industry with highly reproducible scientific documents. to present
For me, an article from 50 years ago is more reliable and documented than an unsupported claim per second now. Even if that claim is a true claim, it cannot be used publicly because it has not been tested and judged by reputable centers.
It is mentioned that there is a disease, a virus, which no one knows about except us, and we have been able to cure the viral disease! And whoever makes a discussion about it, accounts with specific and aggressive guards and generally defenses based on generalizations and unscientific start to create an atmosphere. This is not very beautiful and worthy.
In viral disease, we have only two ways: one is prevention (quarantine, vaccine, proper nutrition and breeding), two is treatment of secondary infection caused by injuries and improvement of the potential of the immune system.
If the cause is viral, then the claim to cure the disease is rejected.
If the PCR test is negative, those test results sheets will be published! Anyway, if there is an experimental result, it should be presented in the article and reject the results of previous studies, not in the Telegram group! The audience is not me, but the audience is the authorities and scientific centers, and if they confirm, it is definitely acceptable for me personally.
Considering that it has been mentioned that this issue has been worked on for several years, where has at least one valid article of all these tests and treatments even at the level of a case report been published?
If it is a question of maintaining the confidentiality of the work, at least a commercial treatment kit should be provided to have a physical view and work on it.
In any case, unwritten dictation is not wrong!
In relation to the fact that the disease was in a certain region several years ago, I would like to say that the disease has been reported in America and Africa, but only one team has done laboratory work on this disease, and considering that they have provided a document for the disease. I am reliable. In all reported countries, the appearance and necropsy symptoms are the same and there is no need for PCR testing for each form separately, except in situations where it is necessary to ensure the differential diagnosis of the disease.
According to the reports that I received from the breeder friends, the use of methods such as eye and nose drops, antibiotics and multiple reinforcements did not work and they did not observe a treatment process. The fact that the severity of casualties in one farm is low and the casualties are high in another farm is due to the different reaction of the herd to the disease according to the total conditions that we talked about and has nothing to do with the treatment of the virus!
In general, until new documentation for the disease is presented, for me the diagnosis is according to the information provided in the file. Appearance symptoms, necropsy, age behavior and disease occurrence are the same as the previous observations.
I neither disagree nor agree with the statements of Dr. Iraqi, because the contents are only hypotheses and they have not identified the cause of the disease that they say is a different disease, and if it has been identified, they have not provided confirmed evidence for it. But I hope that if they have a treatment solution for the secondary effects of the virus, they will commercialize it so that it has a clear and descriptive view in the industry and everyone can benefit.
This post is written by ShahabiR1367