Mohammad Mateen Farahani, senior legal expert, 09122999788, candidate for the board of directors of Tehran Real Estate Consultants:
#Initial_and_Review_of_Law_Law
Abstract:
The amendment report that is issued following the agreement between the parties regarding the division of the estate and documented in Articles 300 and 309 of the Customary Affairs Law is final and non-appealable.
Final vote date:
1391/06/18
Final vote number: 9109970220100736
primary vote
Regarding the request of Mrs. (A.) represented by Mr. (M. H. A.) on behalf of Mr. (Y.) and (Z.) and (Sh.) with the last name (Y. N. T.) to divide The death certificate of the deceased (Y.N.T.) according to the request according to the form of the parliament dated 18/10/2013 and it includes #partition by agreement, based on articles 300 and 309 of the Law of Customary Affairs, it is divided by agreement as reflected The finding is issued in the form of the parliament, which is included in the aforementioned decree, regarding the property located on the street, Mr. (Sh. Y.) undertook to buy the share of Mrs. (A.) and within six months, the price and the price is agreed upon by the parties, and Mrs. (A.)’s share is one and a half dong out of six dongs, and about the goodwill of the shop located on the street. It was decided that Mrs. (A.)’s share, which is one and a half dong out of six dongs, was purchased by Mr. (Sh.) until November 2019, and the price is determined by the agreement of the parties, with other details listed in the Majlis report and in the case of the property located in street which has four floors and seven residential units, and Mrs. (A.)’s share is one and a half dong of the total, after doing the inheritance monopolies by reaching an agreement on the price and referring to the expert, Mrs. (A.)’s share by Mr. .) should be purchased, otherwise it should remain jointly for the time being until Mr. (Sh.) is ready to buy it and the property on 1st Street where their parents lived, will be divided or sold by agreement between them, and Also, the property in the warehouse, as well as the 1987 Ford model car, and the implementation of the fourth clause from the date of the agreement, as described in the agreement, are restricted for one year, with the stipulation that if he refuses to fulfill the clauses, he will be required to pay two hundred and fifty million tomans in is the right of the other party and that Mr. (Sh.) commits to deliver a foreign fireproof anti-theft safe to Mrs. (A.) within six months from the current day of the delivery of the representative, which is based on this, the distribution of an agreement that includes a kind of reconciliation. It was composed.
Head of Branch 41 of Tehran General Court of Law
Judgment of the Court of Appeal
Ms. (A.)’s appeal on behalf of Mr. (Y.) and (Z.), both of them (Y.N.T.), regarding the court order No. 67 dated 5/2/91, Branch 41 of Tehran General Court of Law, according to which An agreed division order including a kind of reconciliation in the manner of division of the matrix of the amendment report has been issued, it is not justified and recognized; Because the agreement and compromise on the subject of Articles 309 and 310 of the Customary Affairs Law is not subject to appeal. Based on Articles 2 and 358 of the Law of Procedure of General and Revolutionary Courts in Civil Affairs, the decision to reject the appeal is issued and announced. The decision is final.
Advisors of the first branch of the Court of Appeals of Tehran province/Judiciary Research Institute
This post is written by matin_lawyer