Dear supervising engineer (minority of engineers), you have recently learned to make the approval of the project subject to the approval of the building plans by the design engineer after the final completion of the building construction operation.

Respected supervising engineer (minority of engineers), you have recently learned to make the approval of the final project subject to the approval of the building plans by the design engineer after the final completion of the construction operation, and accordingly you send the owner and the office to the designer, who put pressure on him; You are not out of two situations:

Or are you ignorant of the law, that reading the attached letter will help you to know what the law and regulations tell you in this matter! The same seven or eight months that the provincial police organization gave this order was illegal and due to many complaints, the implementation of this order was canceled. The above letter was also issued in this regard

Or you were very sharp and clever and sat in front of yourself and thought that you have unlimited strength and power and now that the final approval of the building is in your hands; You have the right to give orders to the owner and other engineering elements as you wish!!!!

If you have thought to yourself that by obtaining approval from the design engineer, you can put some of the possible future responsibilities and responsibilities on the shoulders of the design engineer, you are reading blind, know that no legal element in this country gives you this right. did not give If you have this right and you are telling the truth, why don’t you directly request this from the designer by mentioning the legal provisions? Isn’t it possible to write directly for you in Faraham system? Why don’t you write to the designer yourself?!!! Assuming that (assuming that it is not the case) the organization wants the designer’s signature on the bill (which it doesn’t want), what about the observer? What are you doing betting for the owner?

If the initial plans attached to the license, either in terms of general or partial changes in the building architecture or in terms of deficiencies or errors in other technical items, are ambiguous for you and you have recognized that it is necessary to know the designer’s technical opinion, this # It is your right to ask the designer from the very beginning of the work step by step before starting the implementation operation; What right do you allow yourself to ask for the designer’s approval now that the work has been completed and the soul of the designer has not known anything during this time? Who gave you this permission? Who allowed you to assume that the designer is so ignorant and encroach on his field of work? Were his plans incomplete and formal in terms of implementation? Well, where did you go to correspond at the beginning of work? A designer who does not know what was implemented during this period and what you supervised, what can he check and confirm? What other purpose and intention is really in the back of your mind?

It is appropriate for the owners who face this illegal and shameless request from a minority of supervising engineers; Based on the above letter, file a complaint against the supervisor against the illegal obstruction of the approval of the beneficiary’s thesis.

Unhealthy working relationships between project engineering elements are caused by self-interested decisions that are taken at some points. I wish we were aware of the extent of our powers and responsibilities in the future

This post is written by ashabibi1355