I never said that experience is not important or that it is wrong. When we want to check the effect of a substance, ostriches of the same age should be kept in separate pens, each pen should be given one level of that substance, and one pen should be used as The witness should not be given that substance, at the end of the experiment or the period, the weight of the birds in each pen should be calculated, and after slaughter, the health status of the digestive system should be checked, and the numbers should be recorded, and the data should be analyzed with statistical analysis software, so that the result of that claim can be rejected. It must be accepted, when an article about animals is published, it is done on the animal and published, it is not like a person sits in his room and writes a memoir and prints it.
As a concrete example: Some time ago, Mr. Zal Biki, who is a breeder, had a problem with his ostriches, and they were ramming and running inside the pen for no reason. He raised this problem in this group, which according to his colleagues and friends, was used to solve the problem. All the suggestions were to give vitamin C and selenium. We have solved their problem. If it was based on advice and experience, they should have paid the total cost of vitamins that had nothing to do with that problem.
This post is written by ShahabiR1367