Greetings, Your Excellency and all the respected members of Tanveer group.
First of all, I would like to thank you very much for your patience and for your detailed answer, and for not being indifferent to the issues raised.
However, if in this paragraph you mentioned about registering in legal classes without an entrance exam and in order to increase capacity and cover costs and expenses, and according to your highness, it is possible to acquire literacy with money, and according to your highness, acquiring knowledge is only approved when It has been done in the university or the class where you have studied, and other than that, you consider everyone to be unqualified to comment. How and from which text did you come to the conclusion that the person in question did not get his education and information from a university approved by you? Basically, is it possible to have information in your pocket or in your mind? Brad, so I need to draw your attention to some points.
You, who assumed yourself to be superior to others and definitely possess more information with such literature, in which university did you learn such a doctrine that you were not given the right to express a legal opinion to anyone, while all the legal scholars and elders of this science, for even the illiterate Such a ban was not imposed.
However, I reserve the right to respond to each of your statements, but because of the prohibition that you include, because I do not agree, therefore, as a person with an opinion, I gladly accept your opinion and a prohibition for you. I am not saying
And in science and discussion, it is the difference of opinions that opens the doors of progress to mankind, but if you consider yourself so superior that you do not even allow the entry of real estate consultants in giving legal opinions, you are not aware of solving problems such as solving the problems of two people. It seems that basically you do not consider real estate consultants to have the right to have information, and in this case it is also necessary to refer to the same social systems that you adhere to and see who gave you such permission that you do not consider it permissible to express scientific opinion to others.
And anyway, thank you for the love you have for this class.
Expressing a legal opinion is so different from taking a legal action that it is Azharman Al-Shams, how did you consider this post to be a legal action, when instead of objecting, if you could, you would have rejected the content according to your own opinion, and not to object to the words. And you did not notice that the elaboration and length of your answer was not out of compassion, but out of self-conceit. And do you tell your clients what is written in the text of the law and do you talk to your clients from the law book without any explanation and interpretation and with the words that are exchanged between professors and students in the university?
You did not give this right to people like me, who may not be as educated as you, because you used simpler expressions instead of objections, and we considered your statements to be sincere and friendly in order to prevent deviations, while such an understanding of your answer is not conceivable.
In addition, if you are a witness, even in the judicial courts that are the authority to issue judgments, they have not prohibited people from expressing their opinions and defending themselves, and they have not limited them to have a lawyer, while in your opinion, it is possible to even think about legal issues and demands from special rents and the exclusivity of the class of lawyers, of course. Graduates of the university you are looking for is the web.
This post is written by AliVosoughi