A few words about the rumor of the return of the job referral plan (part one)
The rule is as follows (a general rule in all the bureaucratic systems of the contemporary world):
1. Any work, activity, job and profession can be inherently corrupt and abnormal. Not the whole profession, but maybe even less than – say – 5% of the people working in that profession
2. Therefore, the legislator goes to find and see where in the mechanisms of that profession there is a platform that can produce corruption (the ability to produce anything is different from itself), then he tries to design a mechanism. And the proper work is to disturb that bed and close that conduit
3⃣The story of #monitoring the construction of a building is the same. This building is built by an investor, then the units of this building are sold or rented to various people over many years. Now, this part of the inherent duties of the government is to defend the rights of all these citizens who come and go to this building as owners or tenants for years.
4. The government gives an engineer a professional employment license to help him in this important matter
5⃣ There is a possibility (probability; not that it is 100% like this) that some owners (developer investors) are corrupt in the building process. The job of that engineer is to prevent that corruption or error from happening
6⃣ There is a possibility (probability, not that it is one hundred percent) that some of those engineers in front of that owner are not corrupt in doing it and cooperate with him, so that model owners like to follow this model Engineers go and refer the work to them
7⃣ If the authority to choose the engineer is in the hands of the owner, here only a #potential is created for the crime to happen. That is, this happens in a percentage of constructions, not all of them
8⃣ #referral of system work through engineering system organizations without having the right to choose by the owner #solely and only because of the existence of this phenomenon and that’s it.
The rest of everything that happened during the work referral plan (good or bad) #from_one_side is all made and done by the minds and hands of the people who wrote the process for implementing this plan. These events were all #complications of this plan, not its #essence. Its essence was what was expressed
Taking 5% of the engineers’ fees was one of its complications. Now, if the intention is to return this money to the organization, there are other ways. One of them is the cost of issuing the technical identification certificate of the property, which is the responsibility of the organization according to the law. But if the intention is the quality of construction, it should be mentioned in a separate speech
This post is written by ashabibi1355