According to the global Icomos report:
The case of “Hegmatane historical scene and historical center of Hamedan” has been rejected
According to the published report of the World Council of Historical Textures and Monuments (ICOMOS), the case of “Hegmatane Historical Landscape and Historical Center of Hamedan” has been deferred (rejected).
#Maryam_Atyabi
It is said that a group of world registration officials have traveled to Paris for this issue and to try for world registration.
International ICOMUS, whose opinion is very important for the global registration of a work for UNESCO, has suggested to Iran that this case be rewritten and has actually rejected the case and suggested that a good coherent text be written for this case, because ICOMUS Global He believes that the hegemonic site and the urban fabric do not follow a coherent line and a coherent scenario.
‼ Change the area and privacy of the desired area. and the buffer zone (protection privacy) for this file should be written again.
On the other hand, according to the ICOMUS Global Report, the file does not provide complete reasons to prove the Magdean era.
‼ Global ICOMOS noted that based on the nomination file and additional information provided by the member state, only the archaeological remains of the early periods of the city can justify criterion (ii) and/or criterion (iii). While criterion (iv) is not considered justified. Therefore, none of the cultural criteria is justified at this stage.
ICOMUS also demanded that Iran re-do the comparative comparison. In this case, the work in the file is compared with other similar sites that are globally registered and unregistered, and finally the argument is made that the said file is better than the rest of the similar examples for these reasons. and has requested to do this again.
Previously, it was said that combining the hegmatane area and the historical context of Hamedan in one case is wrong, because the context of Yazd is a coherent context, but the hegmatic context is separate from the historical context of Hamedan.
Now, it seems in the ICOMUS report to UNESCO that this problem has appeared, and probably Iran should make Hegmetane as the main core and arena of global registration and propose the historical context as a global reserve, because this is what is inferred from the ICOMUS report. that they have not found coherence between these two parts.
UNESCO either accepts the file as a whole, or “refers” it, in which case it says that the selected topic is good and only the defects of the file should be fixed, or it says that the file is “deferred”, which means that the file is actually rejected and must be written again, just like it happened. which fell for the Masuleh case. Or he says that the file has no value at all and no action should be taken to register it globally.
According to the heritage report; For a long time, Iran’s cases are either deferred or referred, and Iran is forced to use its lobby capacity for global registration.
And this question is always raised, why capacity building and training of experts is not important for any head of organization or minister and vice president of heritage?!
Why every time we have to send certain people to justify actions to this country and that country. Why don’t we invite an expert group from UNESCO once and hold a one-week, two-week or one-month training workshop for domestic experts in the field of how to write documents for the world registration of tangible and intangible heritage, natural, historical, cultural heritage, movable and immovable property. Don’t you?! If something happens to this particular group, what will happen to Iran’s global registration files?
instagram.com/miras_bashi
@mirasbashi
This post is written by maryamatyabi