And respecting the text sent for review and response in the forum

With regards and respect.
The text sent for review and response in the forum. Working visa from Isfahan system
1- The lack of an electronic reporting system has caused us to be questioned regularly in the municipal areas. We explain the violation. They say it is crowded
We write briefly, they say it doesn’t make sense. In municipalities, there is no fixed procedure for accepting violations. Some people act as if they are after us
We are a violation, and it seems that the builders and owners are guilty. The warnings are not announced on time and the owners claim ignorance and they have the right.

2- The stage report form is worse than the violation form. Some people think that we do not know the form of violation. Some people think that we
Smartly, we have not written a violation and we will include it at a stage. Some people think that this form should not be on the owner’s file. Some say, staged form
It does not belong to the municipality. They say give it to your system.

3- In the specialized group, some people should be present in the system, not every day, but on certain days during the year (3 years) and answer technical/legal questions.
The members should respond. The non-response of the competent people has caused when an administrator/owner goes to the system to get a legal/technical answer and complains.

A broker or an unscrupulous or they tell him to write a couple of lines that the supervisor will not cooperate! And after you have created the document, tell the supervisor or withdraw
Give me back my money or I will complain to the police council, etc. The supervisor who goes to the system and says that I have a contract, some people tell him
It is better to give up and write a code of ethics and professional behavior for this reason! And the real observer is unhappy and the virtual observer is happy

4- Sari cities. Arak Qom. Azerbaijan Mashhad Alborz Tehran. Qazvin and many cities. They have system reports. Isfahan after 5 years of memorandum of understanding! ?
It is better for the municipality to interact with the system and vice versa. And this is announced in the news as a step forward. Spring does not die, spring comes.
They want to end these three years with these words. The first 6 months of writing an understanding! Next year emphasis on understanding. Final year more emphasis on understandings

5- Why in topic 2, paragraph 2-5 related to the supervisor, cases with great difficulty are imposed on the supervisor and all allies are pursued against him?
But the same subject 2 and paragraph 2-6 of the municipalities are slow and sometimes remain silent. Only note 7 of article 100?
Again, the same subject 2, paragraph 2-7, engineering system and agencies, same behavior. Waiting for Note 7 of Article 100?
And in the same topic, paragraph 2-8-2, high supervision and meaningful silence of experts, and again, note 7 of article 100!

Then several times a year, the national inspection/governorship/fire department/urban development will issue an urgent action letter. .that
Why are dissertations/supervisions/issuance of documents/incidents like this?

That’s why it hasn’t gotten worse so far and we have 20% real observers and 80% fake (before Corona, 60 to 70% fake).
It is because of the awake and unassuming conscience of honorable observers who burn and build every year
And they witness thousands of meters of planning/monitoring works from the direct urban planning channel.
When will we really be right? When will we get clarification? When will we wake up?
Maybe we are going to be eliminated gradually with the subsidence of the earth! ?

You, dear reader, please tell me in this direction, how far will you accompany me?

Thank you for your patience, care and tact, and all the caring people involved

Thanks – Turkan