Dear Mr. Dr. Survey;
While thanking you for your series of good analysis, with permission and if I don’t dare, I will summarize my opinion of your content. Please tell me at the end if this perception is correct and what you say or not. I hope, as always, the summary will not be longer than the main text
At the end, we will have a conclusion and a few minutes to mention the last tragedy of the pulpit.
Summary of contents:
1. Why to be a candidate. What is the goal of each candidate to become a candidate. In the meantime, those who object to the existing situation, and naturally the community that voted for them are also those who object to the existing situation, should be further investigated.
2. The concept and use of coalition. Consider a group of 15 people. Each of the candidates in this group (list) has a number of votes for themselves. Let’s put the votes of all these 15 people in one basket and remove their commonalities. A coalition has something around 1000 to 1500 votes that they allocate to each other.
3. Separation of types and types of alliances with different intentions and working methods. A group that gathers together to be recognized. A group that from the very beginning, even before being elected, divides the organizational positions between themselves and the fans and uses all kinds of methods and promises to get votes. A group with the presence of several well-known veterans who are not willing to trade to get a few more or less votes
4. Trying to form a coalition that is independent of the above situations and the opinion of the elders of different branches of the engineering system. Sanofi includes all organizations and associations. This happened in this period, although there were many hardships and stone-throwing on its way
5. Definition of the majority group versus the minority group. The majority dissatisfied with the existing situation against the minority that created this situation in the past years
6. The victory of the minority thinking over the majority and the analysis of why this happened. The failure of the majority thinking due to the division, dispersion and division of their votes among a large number of their candidates. The victory of minority thought is due to the strong cohesion of their traditional supporters and their subsets
7⃣Definition of real votes versus fake votes. Unreal votes are votes obtained in a completely correct and legal form, but without the necessary content and recognition. Votes that can be directed and controlled in one or more baskets.
And but
And but
8⃣ The existence of a ballot box consisting of about 1000 to 1200 coherent and organized voters. The ones you are going to explain about later and call it the deciding vote
If so far our understanding of your content – briefly – was correct, please confirm
Due to the length of the article, the conclusion and mention of the end of the pulpit will be made at the next opportunity
Tea at the end of fasting and dinner belong only to those who sit and listen until the end
This post is written by ashabibi1355