see friends
It is definitely better if someone has worked for 7 years
And it can be compared with someone who has graduated
This is a wrong thought
The most important parts of your application consist of a portfolio, resume and SOP
These 3 should be in sync with the general goals of the university
That you have the best portfolio and resume, but the goals you mention in your SOP are not in accordance with what is happening in that university.
It definitely doesn’t matter how much you worked
On the other hand, a person has graduated and knows that he is applying to a certain university for a specific purpose
Acceptable portfolio
Normal resume
But sop is talking about that person’s passion for that university and what he can do in that university
It will definitely come up
The year after me, the University of Utah funded a friend of mine again with 6-7 years of work and more resume
At the same time, he gave the same amount of funds to a person who was just graduating
Because these two people wanted one thing in common from Utah
Tulane covered 90% with my work experience, architectural awards, resume collection, portfolio, and the SOP I wrote.
But I also had 2 rejections from universities where newly graduated students received funds
So it’s not like they are making an unfair comparison
This post is written by sahar8304