Handicrafts was a management at the heart of the Ministry of Industries, with a description of duties that mostly followed the industrial and, of course, economic side. In the integration with the management of cultural heritage and tourism, it got stuck in strange layers and circles, and the result was commercialized versions, and one of the advantages of which was enough to turn Iran into a regional hub with branding and due attention, it caused the crafty markets. to take shape, advantages such as carpets, needlework, glabton, ink painting – with a cultural history of more than three thousand years – pottery and water-based pottery and so on. . This was despite the fact that in the not-so-distant past in the cultural heritage organization, there was a topic called traditional arts, about which the name of tradition should perhaps be changed to native-native or indigenous arts- and for this topic, experts were trained in the cultural heritage faculty.
Now there is neither that faculty, nor related specialists, nor a program to recognize the advantages that, with the appropriate formula and policy, can play a role in employment, up-to-date entrepreneurship, technology, and millions of other issues in Iran. If proper attention was paid to the cultural heritage organization and the communication network of these fields in the stage of merging handicrafts with cultural heritage, it could create a huge capacity for Iran in synergy with the government’s economic plans.
The issue of tourism is one of the other issues left for such a ministry after the merger of the tourism organization, and in all past periods, it has been reduced to a specific quasi-economic approach with a tourist approach and a purely foreign exchange perspective. Today, if we go to the experts in these fields, we will see that they have a chaotic work situation, job insecurity, lack of sufficient knowledge in most cities, few openings and so on. All of them are the consequences of neglecting the issue of tourism; To these issues, special attention should be paid to the conflict between the field of tourism and cultural heritage, for this purpose it is necessary that even tourism itself be redefined in the structure of this ministry and its communication network with cultural heritage and handicrafts be defined. to be
https://www.sharghdaily.com/fa/tiny/news-937376
instagram.com/miras_bashi
@mirasbashi
This post is written by maryamatyabi