hello
good time
Mr. Engineer, your post is a forward post. Apart from your highness’s opinion of agreeing or disagreeing with the ideas presented in it, the humble answer is boldly not to your highness. To the author, it is rude and ignorant (unintelligent is not a curse, it is just a #characteristic), so please don’t be misunderstood.
In addition, if the reader takes my answer to flatter the honorable current head of the organization, it is his own problem
In the literature and the writing of the response prepared to the words of Mr. Engineer of the partners, there is a negative sense of confrontation, enmity and malice. This model of responding to an official comment is deeply insulting and obviously comes from somewhere else
Mr. Engineer did not put two or three words in front of the name of the head of the organization
Use of phrases:
The handwriting of his comrades
Trinidad and Tobago
Coffee house rules
Turn around and it’s over
And at the end of a poem
It is a sign of emotional peak, rudeness and lack of value of this answer model
Channel 9 deals with building control regulations only to generate hatred and insults to the previous team of the ministry, which was clearly done after standing up to the desertion of some heads of the engineering system. Its moderators are terribly hot-tempered and impolite, and in the group they had, if the smallest question was asked that was just to clarify the ambiguity and they did not like it, the questioner would be blocked with a blink of an eye!!! (This happened to me personally)
It is one thing that some of the owners of the engineering profession (managers of offices and companies, both official and real and unofficial and brokers) tend to choose and control the financial flow of the supervisor’s fee in their hands. Flowing money without account to the organizations is from the pocket of the #engineer and not the #owner. It is one thing and that a definition was made in the difference between the #nature of supervision and the #inspection and control of the building and according to the theory of the legal vice president for control and inspection (which In essence, it is the sovereign supervision and outside the owner’s right to choose) it was recognized that the authority issuing the license (municipality) is one letter. An event that, if implemented and stabilized and its subsequent consequences, could at least remove these life-long #deadly responsibilities from the shoulders of the supervising engineer and cause a group of engineers to be employed in the license issuing institution.
In this one paragraph, Mr. Engineer, the partners are one hundred and twenty percent correct. These gentlemen do not have any understanding of the inherent concept of referral work and the fight is over the same 5% from the pocket of the #engineer
This post is written by ashabibi1355