If the US attacks, the human cost will be irreparable, but other than that, what does it want to do? It is supposed to destroy a port, two refineries and four military bases. With 100 h.m.t., they can be rebuilt again. (H.M.T = thousand billion tomans)
But when the government gives 14 billion dollars 10,000 tomans below the price to a certain group, 140 HMT has been damaged.
When he sells gasoline for one seventh fob and diesel for one twentieth fob, it causes waste and smuggling.
It is estimated that out of 200 million liters of gasoline and diesel that are distributed daily, a quarter is wasted or smuggled. According to the plan, 50 cents per liter, 10 billion dollars, or 140 HMT of this country’s capital is either burned for no reason, or is taken out of the country.
America sanctioned the banking system and the oil industry, but the country’s exchange network messed up our own government. America tried to make export and import difficult, but the scarcity of paper, diapers, and meat was the work of our own government. Prohibiting the export of tomatoes, eggs, dates, livestock, etc. to neighboring countries, which was not America’s doing. Difficult and time-consuming customs clearance, which was not America’s work!
The American Centcom Command can launch a few missiles and destroy the country’s infrastructure and equipment with a few HMTs. But we have an economic commander in the country who has 280 HMT of damage only in one year, and that too only from two of his economic policies.
What does America scare us from?!
Although the damage that Mohammad Baqer Nobakht and Hassan Rouhani did to the country’s economy, the American army cannot do, but the fact is that Nobakht and Rouhani are not the main problem of this country.
The main problem is that for 50 years, our economic policy makers have not known anything other than interfering in pricing.
If Hojjat-ul-Islam Raisi had won in 1996, who was the economic commander today? According to the composition of their election headquarters, it would probably be Farhad Rahbar or Ali Nikzad. Well, we saw the performance of these people during the 9th and 10th governments. The policy of 2011 was not much different from 2017.
Let’s go further back. If Mirhossein Mousavi was the president today, who would be in charge of the economic team? The chief economic advisor of Mousavi’s campaign headquarters was Farshad Momeni. So, in that case, maybe today the economic commander would be Farshad Momeni, and maybe the head of the central bank would be Hossein Raghofer. For a year, on the one hand, they complain about the prevalence of rent in the country’s economy, and on the other hand, they say that the dollar is 4,200 tomans expensive and should be sold cheaper!!! So in that case, our situation would not be better than today.
Today, it is Nobakhti and Rouhani who are destroying the country’s economy. But it is likely that the economic team of none of the presidential candidates in recent years would have performed differently. As in the opinion of the late Highness, the helmsman of the economic policies of the 60s, economic policy was nothing but pricing!
It has been the same for 50 years. Since the late 1940s, when Mohammad Reza Pahlavi left the economic team of the 1940s and took action himself through Hoyda, the economic policy of the country has been unscientific until now.
The destructive power of a wrong economic policy is tens of times that of American bombs and missiles. It doesn’t matter who is in office, until the economic policy is scientific, the potential abilities of this land and this nation will not be realized.
This post is written by amirsalimiQ