In the style sheet, Note 2, Article 24, design offices and the requirement for a design engineer to be a member of an office in order to use their own design capacity have been canceled (the existing offices have been temporarily extended without an increase factor for their members, and at the same time, the same designers Members of temporary offices can freely cooperate with any other owner and office). According to Clause A-1, Article 3 of this policy, in the design services department, the owner first enters into a contract with an architect to prepare design drawings (phase one) and then this designer contracts with designers of other fields to prepare drawings for other disciplines. Closes and moves the work forward.
In practice, in the last two decades, these steps are carried out through design offices. In addition to marketing and obtaining work, design offices were involved in choosing designers and preparing plans, and most of the owners’ files were handed over to engineers through these offices. What was deducted from the engineer during these years under the title of #office contribution was also for these services. The share of the office did not have an approved figure and there was an internal agreement between the office and the engineer, which usually in most cases was 20% of the tariff. #He has received much less than 80% of the tariff!!!!!
In the style book, the lawgiver correctly gave the architect the right to coordinate the design of the project that he is the designer of, so it is logical that a percentage of the design fee should be allocated to him for this activity, and this cannot be He took the legal right from him or necessarily defined an office in charge of this department
At the same time, it is feared (which will surely happen) due to things such as the lack of mastery of a number of designers in administrative processes, not having enough time (full-time), not having a suitable office and office equipment and hardware, and that All of them are necessary to assemble a project, the owners are confused and the case is delayed. In addition to the owners, three other designers will definitely suffer
The organization has defined the process of this work very appropriately and completely legally. If an architect-designer directly enters into a working relationship with the owner in a project, this is the right of the architect-designer to manage and coordinate the design department, and a percentage of the fee (15% approved by the organization) is given to him. For other designers, it will not make a difference in practice, because this percentage will be deducted from them for project coordination services. will belong to the office
It seems that there is a typographical error in the text of this notice. The number of allowed work of a true designer is 8. The architect designer can only coordinate the projects that the architect himself is the designer of that project. So the number of 25 projects is wrong for a true designer. However, limiting an engineering office to a maximum of 25 works does not seem to be a correct policy (at least in the design department) and causes the loss of the right of offices that have the necessary facilities for more work.
All that was said in the supervision section is also true (according to the guidelines), with the difference that in the legislative supervision phase, this task was assigned to the civil inspector or architect.
What is meant by the office here are those offices that have a work deduction permit from the organization in Sajam and deal with the coordination of supervision and design services.
This post is written by ashabibi1355