micro-negotiations
One of the foundations of the “trust” of people around a person is the level of “transparency” in his “behavior and speech”. This person can be a friend, relative or colleague or even a “legal person” such as a company or an organization. People may not be able to prove biases due to lack of transparency and “data censorship”, but this lack of transparency itself is the “reason for inaccuracies”.
Especially when the rights of others are involved. Lack of transparency and lack of accountability is basically the reason for “guilt and violation”.
A large part of the financial affairs of the organizations of the construction engineering system is based on the money deducted from the “engineers’ salary” and the members have the right to know where it is spent. Also, regarding the decisions related to “employment capacity”, “wage discounts” which are another type of member’s rights, they have the right to know the “origin of decisions” and “approvers”. It is the obvious rights of members.
One of the topics of transparency is the publication of “content of meetings and negotiations”. It is necessary for engineers to be aware of the “micro-discussions” that take place in the meetings of the board of directors or the central council.
The minutes of the final meeting under which he signed “for and against” is never enough for this purpose, but the “arguments” and the explanation that each of the speakers object to rejecting or accepting the agenda of the meeting are necessary for “members’ awareness”.
The affairs of the engineering system are a group of professional or technical issues, and there is no “confidential issue” that can be neglected under this excuse. According to the law of confidential documents, it has its own “specific definition”, usually it does not include the field of engineering system.
This clarification can be the written publication of “minutes of conversations” or “audio file” or “journalist’s presence” in the meetings.
It can be useful to know the details of the meetings of the board of directors from various aspects.
First, “in case of deviation”, these decisions are quickly reflected and necessary measures are taken.
Second, they can know their representatives better, and this is again important in “election or non-election” and in line with meritocracy.
And thirdly, the agenda of the meetings are usually the daily problems of the organization, and the views that the members of the meeting present and discuss about it are very useful for the “development of public awareness” of the members.
Silk – June 1403
https://t.me/azgeleh
This post is written by MHABRISHAMI