Here is the question:
It is obvious that the Research Institute of Archeology is a small rescue research institution next to the Ministry and apparently the authority for conducting research, and the Research Institute has no branches in the provinces and has no responsibility in the field of administrative and executive activities of archeology in the country.
In this situation, who is the custodian, policy maker, integrator and manager and planner of the country’s (non-research) archaeological issues in the administrative structure of the Ministry of Cultural Heritage and the structure of the general administrations of the provinces?
Unfortunately, after nearly 25 years since the establishment of the cultural heritage and about 5 years since the establishment of the Ministry of Cultural Heritage, the management of archeology in the country, despite the training of hundreds of capable experts and the removal of dependence on foreigners in this field, has been a burden in every direction and without a trustee, floating and It has been done as desired by many different people and unfortunately it is done, the root of many problems of the people and other institutions and even the government and governing bodies with the Ministry of Cultural Heritage and even the problem of looting and smuggling of the country’s historical monuments is right here, the deputies of the country’s cultural heritage. By projecting, they have always seen the archeology problems of the country from the eyes of the archeology research institute and have turned their backs on the broad issues of this field.
This basic question now requires a clear investigation and answer from the respected Minister of Cultural Heritage: why in the structure of the Ministry of Cultural Heritage, while an important part of the administrative duties of the Ministry of Cultural Heritage is directly related to archeology and is carried out by archaeologists, and archeology could be one of the main titles in The name of the Ministry of Home Affairs, “Archaeology” has no name and administrative position?
It seems that due to the increasing problems and threats in the management and maintenance of the country’s ancient monuments and sites, the time has come that with the realism and courage of the Honorable Minister of Cultural Heritage, contrary to the love and hatred that has been institutionalized in this organization and constantly And the wall of the ministry is heard, with the view of fairness, justice and responsibility, the order to investigate and create a structure for the coherent management of the executive issues of archeology in the Ministry of Cultural Heritage as “Deputy of Archeology” or as “General Directorate of Archeology” under Areas related to the Ministry of Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts and even archeology groups in the organizational chart of the provinces were formed by using the many abandoned and scattered facilities and this abnormal situation that is not suitable for these organizations and its consequences from time to time Does it show itself to end?
https://tinyurl.com/22m8fx2y
instagram.com/miras_bashi
@mirasbashi
This post is written by maryamatyabi