Examining the government systems of the world: What is the #parliamentary_monarchy system?
The [parliamentary] monarchy system is based on the separation of responsibilities between the three branches of the legislature, judiciary and executive. In a democratic contest, political parties send representatives to the parliament (or the National Assembly) by the people’s vote.
When the representatives vote for the prime ministerial candidate of the parties in power, the king declares his legal and spiritual support by electing him as the prime minister of the country.
The prime minister and his government delegation will remain in their position without time limit as long as they are approved by the people’s representatives in the parliament and satisfy the nation, and if they lose the trust of the parliament, they will be dismissed immediately.
Without being imposed on the country for a period of four years (or more), which is the characteristic of republican systems, in other words, the power in the parliamentary monarchy system is not individual and hereditary, because the executive power is at the disposal of the prime minister, his ministers and the parliament, which is elected by each referendum by People are confirmed or dismissed.
Although the king is the head of the country (except for Japan and Sweden, where the king does not even have the title of head of the country), he lacks extensive power and therefore is not responsible for the shortcomings and inabilities of the executive branch. Therefore, #parliamentary_kingdom is not an individual government.
The #prime_minister elected by the parliament, which is itself based on the #national_will, is the head of the executive branch and not a #royal_institution.
The royal institution is a tradition rooted in the history of Iran, but now it can have a completely symbolic role. In #Iran, the king can be a symbol of the unity of the different clans of the country.
In the older era, in England in the 17th century, after eleven years of the republic, the system of the monarchy was returned to the parliamentary monarchy.
Contrary to the propaganda of some republicans who say that if a monarchy is established in a country, it cannot be returned, in a few examples, we have seen the return of a monarchy to a country after a period of republic. In the present era, Spain, which witnessed the return of King Juan Carlos and the institutionalization of democracy after General Franco, is a living example. Also, Cambodia, which witnessed the return of the kingdom and peace in 1993 after years of Khmer Rouge crimes in the seventies and eighties, is another suitable example.
Our whole misfortune is that we knew how to walk ourselves, but this army of English intellectuals came to teach you how to walk in Quebec. For a lifetime, I shouted that every nation has its own way and tradition in governance. It is as if you are talking to a wall with newly founded and identityless countries like banana republics, which have no identity, no historical political tradition, but it is useless.
Once, the British people made a mistake, they tried the republic, from the heart of Cromwell’s dictatorship, they overthrew Cromwell with a bloody revolution and never spoke of the republic again.
Once the people of Spain fell into the trap of the Franco republic, after years of saying we were wrong, they returned Prince Juan Carlos from Italy and drew a line around the republic.
But, surprisingly, some Iranian people, surprisingly, this light-hearted army cursed this conspiracy and deceit of the British, who deposed their colonialist rival, France, from the monarchy and became the symbol of republican governments, and the result is completely clear.
Surprisingly, they don’t give up on this prominent Anglophile intellectual who will be bitten a thousand more times by this republican hole so as not to completely destroy Iran.
This post is written by Egh_ba