Since yesterday, a style sheet of designer and supervisor legal entities has been circulating in cyber space (it should be regretted that, as in Mr. Akhundi’s era, in order to be transparent, the style sheets are not published on the official website for comments) which contains some general points in I need to say about it:
1- Some people believe that legal entities should implement the construction engineering system similar to the technical system. Well, in the technical-executive system, insurance is a mandatory item and it affects the calculation points. Well, why is it not mandatory to provide a list of insurance mentioned in the prepared policy?
You can’t copy and paste the formulas from Honor, but don’t copy and paste the logic behind the topic (social security insurance)!!!
2- We are going to take the employment capacity (size and number of jobs) of a legal entity slightly more than the placement of several natural persons to pay taxes, insurance and general expenses of the company. Well, when the insurance of the company’s engineers is not required, why is the employment capacity increased?
3- Items that have been privileged for a legal person, which are now not privileged for a real person. such as matching a person’s master’s degree or doctorate with engineering activity. Do they give a special privilege to a real engineer with a master’s degree in civil engineering? What justice is this!!!
4- Another thing is that in the table of the maximum number of tasks, for example, it says 50 design tasks and 50 supervision tasks. Well, the company is supposed to get 50 design jobs and 50 supervision, or is the total design and supervision 50? Why is such an important point not explained in the manual!
Currently, a natural person (qualified for both design and supervision) can take a total of 8 jobs, whether he is designing, supervising, or designing and supervising.
5-Next, why is the signature of the real person of the company deducted from the technical documents compared to the current notification style? Does the signature of the real person of the company have a special cost that they removed in order to reduce costs???
When we go to the hospital (a type of legal entity), we see the signatures and explanations of each doctor on the medical documents. Why is it not supposed to be signed by people in engineering?
6- But the key point. For example, each real person of level 1 has 8 jobs and 16,000 square meters of capacity. 4 will be real, 32 jobs, 64 thousand square meters. Let’s assume that these real estates are for the company, including taxes, insurance and general expenses, and they will find a capacity of 36 works of 70,000 square meters. How many people is the capacity defined in the guidelines for companies? If it does not match the real situation, it is still a trade injustice.
7- The last item. Level 2 person is competent to design building A and B according to executive regulations. How is it possible for a company to design building A, B and C by bringing in a level 2 engineer? This case can be overturned in the Court of Administrative Justice.
In the end, I am sure that in the end, in response to this criticism, people inside will say that Tabarzadi was wrong, and they will not even say why my words are wrong. Uncriticism and non-consultability are not exclusive to the previous government and this government, but from now on, it can be said that the next government will also be non-criticism and non-consultation. Author: Mr. Engineer Abolfazl Tabarzadi Join us: @Madeh_33
This post is written by rezapayam