# send
A specialized committee or a joint stock company?!
Signature reserved
When we look at the published list of the Committee for the Selection of the Minister of Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts, we are surprised on the one hand and we say that it is not far from expected.
A series of former managers have been arranged together who have been residents and tenants of this organization or ministry for some time due to political connections and without organizational history or related field of study, and the official position of the ministry or related organization has led them to accept this position, but Now, after this temporary residence, they consider themselves the owners and claimants of the diverse and multiple fields of the Ministry of Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts, and they are determined to propose the minister and manager for it.
Since the people on this list were transferred from the president-elect’s headquarters to this committee, an excuse must be made for their presence in the committee, and what better than the title of “elite”?! But are these people really the elites of fields related to cultural heritage and tourism and handicrafts?
From this wide area of the Ministry of Heritage, were there no specialists with the main and related fields of this field? For a government that claims expertise and specialization, are these people really experts in this field and the most experts?
Was there no one in the group of educated and educated youth related to famous specialized fields or basic fields to be included in this composition? Does this combination achieve the meaning of youthfulness desired by the elected president?
It is unfortunate that there is no name in this committee from the huge number of women experts active in all three areas covered by the ministry!!
It is known that this ministry (as well as the previous organization) has remained a backyard and a place for politicians without positions, and now it is a combination that is mostly political and the majority of it is unrelated, and the performance of their management periods was not acceptable to experts and they always faced criticism to the decision makers of this became the field.
‼ What seems more and causes regret is that triple specializations are still not official in this ministry. A professor of French and semiotician, who has been a guest of this organization for a while in the field of handicrafts, becomes the secretary of the committee and is from the famous fields of archeology, restoration, anthropology, museology, handicrafts activists, tourism, etc. There is no address in this combination.
One should ask, what bias does the presence of the head of an organization with all his former deputies show?
If the composition of other committees has welcomed the specialists of that field and their relationship with the committee, but the composition of the cultural heritage, tourism and handicrafts committee leads to a lack of comprehensive communication and the closing of the committee to quota agreements within the committee.
https://tinyurl.com/28hnxspv
instagram.com/miras_bashi
@mirasbashi
This post is written by maryamatyabi