The complaint of the member of the board of directors of “Non-governmental organization for agricultural development” about the performance of agricultural organizations in the country
Agricultural news – Heka board member’s complaint about agricultural organizations
Kaj Press – 04/27/1400
Kaj Press – Hossein Tavakoli Nik, a member of the Board of Directors of the Non-governmental Organization for Agricultural Development (HACA), by sending a note to the future agriculture news site (Kaj Press), expressed his regret about the lack of political, economic and trade union independence of Iran’s agricultural organizations, and the Board of Directors These organizations strongly complained about the lack of positive impact and playing the role that their cultural mission requires in creating cohesion and defending the rights of farmers.
In this note, Tavakli says: the performance of the board of directors of Iranian agricultural organizations and the issue of their lack of active presence in determining the fate of the sector and introducing a trusted minister who is directly related to determining the fate of the sector is very impressive and is caused by a lack of will and independence. It is political, economic, social, union and civil of organizations and it is also a reason for not having comprehensive training and culture of organizational management.
Hossein Tavakoli Nik adds in another part of his note: Generally, the selection of board members is done through communication and one or two non-specialized scientific and practical environmental indicators and criteria, which this structure and procedure is capable of establishing a mechanism to defend The rights of the activists of the sector have not been cheated. Unfortunately, with this approach and way of thinking, organizations have not been able to make a positive impact on the cohesion and revival of farmers’ rights and take a constructive step towards the sustainable development of agriculture.
The managers of our agricultural organizations have mainly followed the vacuum of pluralism of the previous affiliated organizations and have practically always become dependent on the government system and thinking. In the most optimistic state; Their attitude, behavior and performance have been based on personal communication with the officials, not on the legal and specialized position and facilitation in meeting public and national needs. On the other hand, they have always followed the criteria of relationship and person-centered interactions with officials, which is the worst and most destructive method of management.
Unfortunately, with this model of behavior, personal rights can be preferred over national rights, and by replacing wrong management methods; The power of relationship instead of the authority and validity of the power of law; It has led to the neglect of collective wisdom and the deprivation of public trust and belief and the deterioration of the culture of cooperation, organization and organization, which is a strong requirement to review the scientific, specialized, managerial education and culture of the members and trustees of organizational affairs in order to promote and develop as one of the indicators. There is a cooperative culture.
Tavakli says: In these many years, we got used to government mismanagement, and now we don’t know what to do with the mismanagement of the organization and the private sector!
Fortunately, the honorable president-elect has introduced and announced a website in order to overcome the problem of government mismanagement and public participation, but unfortunately, the organizations not only do not use this opportunity, but also shirk the burden of responsibility.
This post is written by U920nima