The essence of a #designer’s work is to calculate and design plans for the execution and construction of a building
The fact that for any reason (any reason, intent) what the designer delivers when issuing the permit is not implemented has nothing to do with the designer engineer, nothing to do with it.
Neither the design engineer, nor the supervising engineer, nor the executive engineer, none of them are responsible for deciding how to construct the building and deviating from the so-called municipal plans (they are not responsible for making decisions, not that they are not responsible for the implementation of the relevant engineering services).
Deciding to implement the building, excess or different from what is included in the plans attached to the license – for any reason, intention and intention is solely the responsibility of the #owner and not otherwise.
Dear supervisor and executive engineers, according to their current and expertise, they have the legal right and authority to stop the relevant engineering services from the beginning (executor) and prevent the continuation of the work (supervisor) if any deviation is observed.
It is desirable and ideal for the owner to be required by law and regulation to refer to design engineers to prepare executive plans for the structure that he intends to build, but where are the legally approved processes from the issuance of the permit to the completion of this #legal_requirement for the owner There is? (The legal requirement is different from the fact that the owner, in order to feel the need to have an executive plan, only informally refers to a specialist design engineer in the structural and architectural department)
Like any other project, there is a possibility that during the execution of the work, there is a need for changes in the design and therefore the presence of the design engineer, but where is this seen in the above-mentioned approved processes?!!!!!
It is not the job of a design engineer to prepare and approve a blueprint. Ezbilt’s name is AS (as it was) BIULD (it was built), so it has been translated as “as-built” and “as-built” maps.
They did not say AS DESIGNED!!!
The blueprint is the drawing and drawing of the work carried out by the building contractor, which must be approved by the monitoring body in order to be included in the project’s records and documents and to refer to it in the future in times such as the need for repairs, demolition, etc. Is
Please don’t make fun of these basic and trivial concepts in an engineering service system so much that if others laugh at us, they are right.
Even if the design drawings do not have the slightest change in execution, still preparing and approving the billet drawing is not the work of the design engineer!!!!
If you do not know or for any other reason you are not able to make a single map (uniting the municipal map with the executive), please do not make fun of the design engineers. Its meaning according to the nature of the work) can have consequences and responsibilities for the design engineer.
The design, which was not anywhere in the construction process, now has to approve a plan that he did not prepare and present!!!
This post is written by ashabibi1355