The reality of fund flow is that first you have to check and make sure if the university has funds at all or not.
Most of them have a general admission that their funds are not clear, check the names of the universities, there are universities with high tuition fees, low funds and scholarships (of course, in relation to tuition fees).
Of course, the funding of many universities will be determined later.
For example, the universities increase my acceptance rate and give everyone 10,15,000, so that they can get the remaining 60,000 to 50,000 from everyone.
Those universities that have really good funds are also competitive and the whole resume should be really good.
But I think this year compared to last year, the choice of university for children is a bit weaker (don’t make a completely personal opinion).
Because universities that don’t pay more have applied. They don’t care, not in terms of rank. On the contrary, sometimes the rank or name and reputation are high.
But for Iranians without use. University is 50,000, 60,000 a year. Gives 10,000 funds. This fund is not for Iran!!!
Of course, if we are billionaires and give, for example, 3 billion for 1 academic year. Yes, it’s a good choice.
I feel that this year, the children have been seen wherever they can and regardless of the fund issue, the results are mostly letters for more funds.
This post is written by N_Nn_9473