When legal loopholes close the hands of managers and control institutions (part two)

When legal loopholes close the hands of managers and control institutions (part two)

All provisions stated in this article in case of cancellation – possible – supervision referral plan will also be included to respected supervising engineers, so the beneficiaries of this process will not necessarily and forever be design/accounting engineers.

It is most likely that after the notification of the above effective instruction, it will be decided that 100% of the fee will be deposited into the designer’s account (because there is no such thing in the item law that allows a percentage deduction under the title of office or coordinating designer’s share). The law under the title of coordinating designer or design office with member and coefficient does not exist anymore)

At a glance, it seems that this is a good thing for engineers, but the situation will go like this:

The stages of a case, from the marketing and job recruitment stage to all the coordination until the end, are and will be done through the engineering offices. This is not a bad thing in itself, but a positive thing

When there is no specific percentage for the legal right of the offices (coordinating designer) and the entire tariff is deposited into the engineer’s account, the offices will have no choice but to make the assignment of the work conditional on the payment of the office fee by the engineer (the possibility of obtaining it from the owner is also due to the lack of legal permission Does not exist)

This situation is a very good legal and customary excuse to include the discount in the form of a percentage that the engineer must pay to the office (in the situation of the construction market recession and the back-breaking economic pressures, engineers have no choice but to pay high percentages to the offices) a part of which is a discount that is returned to the owner – they will not have a discount (#discount is a phenomenon that will occur under any circumstances in a situation of extreme imbalance of supply and demand and no one is able to deal with it) We have talked before)

If the engineers, when they see that 100% of the fee will be deposited into their account, mentally and as a result, they will gradually resist paying the share of the office (which they will do, especially in some fields and in prosperous market conditions), practically, the offices They refuse to provide services, the work of the owners is left on the ground and locked, and the atmosphere of public opinion and protests goes towards the cancellation of the whole plan.

The only possible way is that the right of the office (coordinating designer) is changed from the status of customary accepted procedure to the #legal status by obtaining #approval. The most ideal situation is to collect the percentage of the offices from the owner. The fairest thing (considering that the office provides two-way services to the owner and the engineer) is to divide this percentage between the owner and the engineer, and the easiest option is to deduct the fee from the poor engineer. Whatever it is, if this percentage does not have a legal approval, practically everything will return to the previous non-transparent and high-margin state (discounting and brokering).

#remove_discount
#engineering position
#as engineers

This post is written by ashabibi1355